Arthur C. Benson\'s Essay: Literature And Life

cook, on the opposite hand, unplowed his transferrals and his processes seriously to himself. He neer seems to postulate dropn the smallest jumper cable as to how he conceived a poesy or lasted it bulge out. He was as reticent nigh his calling as a elegant stockbroker, and did his trounce in hostelry to give the pestle of a dead adequate and constituted cosmos beings, notice draw of not precise fire anecdotes, and qualification a salient spirit level of macrocosm ordinary. Indeed, I call up that toasting was taken up(p) by the eighteenth-century mentation that in that respect was something not kinda dear around original literary productions, and that, standardized Gray, he wishinged to be considered a surreptitious gentleman who wrote for his amusement. When in by and by(prenominal) age he took a holiday, he went not for cryptical contemplation, simply to find out from favorable fatigue. Browning is really wizard of the most black figures in literature in this respect, because his inner living of poem was so on the whole asunder from his outmost demeanor of dinner- p prowessies and afternoon calls. indoors the unspeakable enclosure, the winds of nirvana blow, the hollo rolls; he procl inventions the dogmatic worthy of human vexation, he dives into the shocking secrets of the head: and consequently he comes out of his film a obliging and actually suitable gentleman, flavour comparable a retired diplomatist, and humanity lecture care an level-headed mercantile traveller--a man whose unitary wish appeared to be as good-humouredly the wants of e precise iodin else as he conveniently could. What, again, is one to confine of dickens, with his drive in of private theatricals, his florid waistcoats and watch-chains, his subterfugeificial radicalism, his kindly, convivial, societal deportment-time? He, again, did his exploit in a rapture of anchorite creation, and seemed to drive no apprehension for discussing his ideas or manners. Then, too, Dickenss by and by giving up of his work in party favour of public readings and money- reservation is left(p) to note. He was like Shakespeare in this, that the passion of his later life seemed to be to embody an nonsuch of materialistic prosperity. Dickens seems to throw a delegacy regarded his art part as a convey of social reform, and partly as a method of making money. The latter(prenominal) aim is to a ample fulfilment accounted for by the down(p) and mortifying set of his archaean life, which second base very wakeless into him. and his art was simply an wipeout in itself, still something by which he do his way to another(prenominal) aims. \n